<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Playing Without a Full Deck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.llewellyn.com/blog/2010/02/playing-without-a-full-deck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.llewellyn.com/blog/2010/02/playing-without-a-full-deck/</link>
	<description>Cultivating a community through the exploration of magical living and spiritual evolution.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:01:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.llewellyn.com/blog/2010/02/playing-without-a-full-deck/comment-page-1/#comment-8247</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 22:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.llewellyn.com/blog/?p=1759#comment-8247</guid>
		<description>Well that is what Jokers are for, or in this case, one of the extra magicians would suffice. You write &quot;5 of Wands&quot; on it and use it as a replacement card.
Using 3 Magicians in one deck? That would give really unbalanced readings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that is what Jokers are for, or in this case, one of the extra magicians would suffice. You write &#8220;5 of Wands&#8221; on it and use it as a replacement card.<br />
Using 3 Magicians in one deck? That would give really unbalanced readings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgianna boehnke</title>
		<link>http://www.llewellyn.com/blog/2010/02/playing-without-a-full-deck/comment-page-1/#comment-7789</link>
		<dc:creator>georgianna boehnke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 00:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.llewellyn.com/blog/?p=1759#comment-7789</guid>
		<description>hi Barbara!  how sweet to see the story of my dog-pal Stoney and the missing 5 of Wands on your blog!  an honour really!  

at the time of the event, it never occurred to me to not use the deck, or (unfortunately) to ask the publisher for a duplicate card.  but even one card shy, that particular deck has probably been one of my greatest tarot teachers.  I&#039;m really glad I kept it! 

broken decks need love too!!  they&#039;ll love you back :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Barbara!  how sweet to see the story of my dog-pal Stoney and the missing 5 of Wands on your blog!  an honour really!  </p>
<p>at the time of the event, it never occurred to me to not use the deck, or (unfortunately) to ask the publisher for a duplicate card.  but even one card shy, that particular deck has probably been one of my greatest tarot teachers.  I&#8217;m really glad I kept it! </p>
<p>broken decks need love too!!  they&#8217;ll love you back <img src='http://www.llewellyn.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theresa</title>
		<link>http://www.llewellyn.com/blog/2010/02/playing-without-a-full-deck/comment-page-1/#comment-7352</link>
		<dc:creator>Theresa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 05:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.llewellyn.com/blog/?p=1759#comment-7352</guid>
		<description>My very first deck was the Rider Waite, and somehow, The Magician was misplaced. This was my excuse to ditch this deck and get the Universal Waite instead. Yes, it&#039;s the same stuff, but the softer illustration style was much less creepy and jangly to me.  I haven&#039;t touched the RW deck in over a decade. The one card that really screwed with me from that deck was Judgement. Ugh, creepy creepy creepy. Hated it. I would have jettisoned it from the deck, but it might have thrown off my groove. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My very first deck was the Rider Waite, and somehow, The Magician was misplaced. This was my excuse to ditch this deck and get the Universal Waite instead. Yes, it&#8217;s the same stuff, but the softer illustration style was much less creepy and jangly to me.  I haven&#8217;t touched the RW deck in over a decade. The one card that really screwed with me from that deck was Judgement. Ugh, creepy creepy creepy. Hated it. I would have jettisoned it from the deck, but it might have thrown off my groove. <img src='http://www.llewellyn.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lada</title>
		<link>http://www.llewellyn.com/blog/2010/02/playing-without-a-full-deck/comment-page-1/#comment-7336</link>
		<dc:creator>lada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 22:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.llewellyn.com/blog/?p=1759#comment-7336</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t get a good feel for the Heirophant. 
to me, when that card comes up (which, actually, is rarely) it always feels like &#039;the Man&#039;...as in the phrase &#039;sticking it to the Man&#039;.  The entrenched network against which I struggle to dislodge their foot from my neck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t get a good feel for the Heirophant.<br />
to me, when that card comes up (which, actually, is rarely) it always feels like &#8216;the Man&#8217;&#8230;as in the phrase &#8216;sticking it to the Man&#8217;.  The entrenched network against which I struggle to dislodge their foot from my neck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.llewellyn.com/blog/2010/02/playing-without-a-full-deck/comment-page-1/#comment-7319</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.llewellyn.com/blog/?p=1759#comment-7319</guid>
		<description>I just ran across Alison Cross&#039;s blog entry about things to do with deck that is missing cards: http://tabitarot.blogspot.com/2010/02/tarot-article-incomplete-decks-and-what.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just ran across Alison Cross&#8217;s blog entry about things to do with deck that is missing cards: <a href="http://tabitarot.blogspot.com/2010/02/tarot-article-incomplete-decks-and-what.html" rel="nofollow">http://tabitarot.blogspot.com/2010/02/tarot-article-incomplete-decks-and-what.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ty</title>
		<link>http://www.llewellyn.com/blog/2010/02/playing-without-a-full-deck/comment-page-1/#comment-7318</link>
		<dc:creator>Ty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.llewellyn.com/blog/?p=1759#comment-7318</guid>
		<description>I once had a card missing from a Lo Sacarbeo deck- i emailed them and I got the card from Italy to the USA in about 5 days!  Now that&#039;s service!

I think I dislike the Heirophant because the the price of a &#039;common culture&#039; often becomes  blind acceptance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I once had a card missing from a Lo Sacarbeo deck- i emailed them and I got the card from Italy to the USA in about 5 days!  Now that&#8217;s service!</p>
<p>I think I dislike the Heirophant because the the price of a &#8216;common culture&#8217; often becomes  blind acceptance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joyce</title>
		<link>http://www.llewellyn.com/blog/2010/02/playing-without-a-full-deck/comment-page-1/#comment-7297</link>
		<dc:creator>Joyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.llewellyn.com/blog/?p=1759#comment-7297</guid>
		<description>Heck, when a card is missing, I just call Llewellyn and tell them one is missing from a deck and they promptly sent me one. It happened a month ago. Bought a deck and a card was missing; called them and they sent me the one I was missing; no questions asked.  my least favorite card is the 4 of Coins/Pentacles -- how dare it suggest I&#039;m stingy.  The 7 of Coins is the next closest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heck, when a card is missing, I just call Llewellyn and tell them one is missing from a deck and they promptly sent me one. It happened a month ago. Bought a deck and a card was missing; called them and they sent me the one I was missing; no questions asked.  my least favorite card is the 4 of Coins/Pentacles &#8212; how dare it suggest I&#8217;m stingy.  The 7 of Coins is the next closest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mothgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.llewellyn.com/blog/2010/02/playing-without-a-full-deck/comment-page-1/#comment-7296</link>
		<dc:creator>Mothgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.llewellyn.com/blog/?p=1759#comment-7296</guid>
		<description>I am an artist when and if a deck becomes useless the left over cards become artwork!They make great additions to mixed media collage etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am an artist when and if a deck becomes useless the left over cards become artwork!They make great additions to mixed media collage etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://www.llewellyn.com/blog/2010/02/playing-without-a-full-deck/comment-page-1/#comment-7291</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 20:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.llewellyn.com/blog/?p=1759#comment-7291</guid>
		<description>You know Babs I&#039;ve never consciously thought about this,  it was an interesting read. I&#039;ve never used a deck on purpose without a card, but I have read on a few occasions without a full deck, by leaving a card behind unnoticed in its box, only to find it after the reading was done.  I&#039;ve always figured in those odd cases that the deck didn&#039;t need that one or it wouldn&#039;t have left it behind! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know Babs I&#8217;ve never consciously thought about this,  it was an interesting read. I&#8217;ve never used a deck on purpose without a card, but I have read on a few occasions without a full deck, by leaving a card behind unnoticed in its box, only to find it after the reading was done.  I&#8217;ve always figured in those odd cases that the deck didn&#8217;t need that one or it wouldn&#8217;t have left it behind! <img src='http://www.llewellyn.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.llewellyn.com/blog/2010/02/playing-without-a-full-deck/comment-page-1/#comment-7290</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 20:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.llewellyn.com/blog/?p=1759#comment-7290</guid>
		<description>Why does everyone hate the Hierophant?!?!?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does everyone hate the Hierophant?!?!?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

